Skip to content

Hy3 vs MiniMax M2-her

Hy3

Tencent

69#106
vs
MiniMax M2-her

MiniMax

69#107
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalHy3DeltaMiniMax M2-her
Capabilities
67
+50
17
Benchmarks
68
-4
72
Pricing
99
+1
99
Context window size
77
+9
69
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
20
-35
55
Overall Result
3 wins
of 6
2 wins
Hy3 wins 3 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (21 data points)
Hy3MiniMax M2-her
Hy3

68.8

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

MiniMax M2-her

68.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Hy3

Tencent

Best Value
Per request$0.000430
Daily$1.43
Monthly$43.00
Annual$516.00

MiniMax M2-her

MiniMax

Per request$0.000900
Daily$3.00
Monthly$90.00
Annual$1080.00

Hy3 saves you $47.00/month

That's $564.00/year compared to MiniMax M2-her at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

52% cheaper
Choose Hy3 for cost optimization

Hy3 pricing:
Input:$0.14/M tokens
Output:$0.58/M tokens
MiniMax M2-her pricing:
Input:$0.30/M tokens
Output:$1.20/M tokens
Tie
Hy3

Tencent

69

Composite Score

Tie
MiniMax M2-her

MiniMax

69

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricHy3MiniMax M2-herWinner
Overall Score
69
69
--
Rank#106#107
Hy3
Quality Rank#106#107
Hy3
Adoption Rank#106#107
Hy3
Parameters------
Context Window262K66K
Hy3
Pricing$0.14/$0.58/M$0.30/$1.20/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
67
17
Hy3
Benchmarks
68
72
MiniMax M2-her
Pricing
99
99
Hy3
Context window size
77
69
Hy3
Recency
100
100
Hy3
Output Capacity
20
55
MiniMax M2-her
Benchmark Head-to-Head(3 benchmarks)
Hy3: 1MiniMax M2-her: 0
Hy3
MiniMax M2-her
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU-Pro
-82%
SWE-bench Verified
-61%
Arena Elo
14131346
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Hy3Competitive

Scores 69/100 (rank #106), placing it in the top 64% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
MiniMax M2-herCompetitive

Scores 69/100 (rank #107), placing it in the top 63% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Hy3 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (262K token context)
  • Agentic applications using tool/function calling
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose MiniMax M2-her when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements
Cost-Performance Analysis
Hy3Best Value
Input cost$0.14/M tokens
Output cost$0.58/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.010
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$10.80
MiniMax M2-her
Input cost$0.30/M tokens
Output cost$1.20/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.022
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$22.50

Hy3 offers 52% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $10.80/month with Hy3 vs $22.50/month with MiniMax M2-her - a $11.70 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Hy3Faster
Speed score0/100
MiniMax M2-her
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Hy3

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Hy3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Hy3

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Hy3

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.58/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Hy3

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (69/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Hy3
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Hy3

Hy3 and MiniMax M2-her are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Hy3
Recommended

by Tencent

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 52% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by MiniMax

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityHy3MiniMax M2-her
Vision (Image Input)
Function Callingdiffers
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Hy3

Tencent

Best Value
$0.9480
estimated monthly cost

MiniMax M2-her

MiniMax

$1.98
estimated monthly cost

Hy3 saves you $1.03/month

That's 52% cheaper than MiniMax M2-her at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterHy3MiniMax M2-her
Context Window262K66K
Max Output Tokens--2,048
Open SourceYesNo
CreatedJul 6, 2026Jan 23, 2026
Last updated: 32m ago

Related comparisons

Hy3 vs MiniMax M2-her (2026) | LM Market Cap