Hy4 preview vs Muse Spark 1.3
| Signal | Hy4 preview | Delta | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -33 | |
Pricing | 98 | +2 | |
Context window size | 96 | -- | |
Recency | 100 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 77 | -19 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 5 | 2 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
Hy4 preview
Tencent
Muse Spark 1.3
meta
Hy4 preview saves you $129.05/month
That's $1548.60/year compared to Muse Spark 1.3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Hy4 preview | Muse Spark 1.3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #240 | #238 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Quality Rank | #240 | #238 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Adoption Rank | #240 | #238 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 1049K | 1049K | -- |
| Pricing | $0.83/$2.50/M | $1.25/$4.25/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 100 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Pricing | 98 | 96 | Hy4 preview |
| Context window size | 96 | 96 | Hy4 preview |
| Recency | 100 | 100 | Hy4 preview |
| Output Capacity | 77 | 96 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 40/100 (rank #240), placing it in the top 18% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #238), placing it in the top 18% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose Hy4 preview when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Choose Muse Spark 1.3 when you need:
- Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Hy4 preview offers 39% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $50.02/month with Hy4 preview vs $82.50/month with Muse Spark 1.3 - a $32.48 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Hy4 preview also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($2.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Hy4 preview and Muse Spark 1.3 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Hy4 preview
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Hy4 preview
39% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Hy4 preview
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Hy4 preview
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Hy4 preview
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Tencent
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 39% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Hy4 preview | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
Hy4 preview
Tencent
Muse Spark 1.3
meta
Hy4 preview saves you $2.85/month
That's 39% cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Hy4 preview | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Max Output Tokens | 64,000 | 943,718 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Created | Aug 28, 2026 | Sep 2, 2026 |