Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 vs Nova 2 Lite
| Signal | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 | Delta | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 59 | +1 | |
Pricing | 100 | +2 | |
Context window size | 73 | -13 | |
Recency | 82 | -10 | |
Output Capacity | 70 | -10 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 3 wins |
Score History
60.1
current score
Tied
right now
60.1
current score
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
NVIDIA
Nova 2 Lite
Amazon
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 saves you $95.00/month
That's $1140.00/year compared to Nova 2 Lite at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 | Nova 2 Lite | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 60 | 60 | -- |
| Rank | #149 | #148 | Nova 2 Lite |
| Quality Rank | #149 | #148 | Nova 2 Lite |
| Adoption Rank | #149 | #148 | Nova 2 Lite |
| Parameters | 49B | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 1000K | Nova 2 Lite |
| Pricing | $0.40/$0.40/M | $0.30/$2.50/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 67 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 |
| Benchmarks | 59 | 58 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 |
| Pricing | 100 | 98 | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 |
| Context window size | 73 | 86 | Nova 2 Lite |
| Recency | 82 | 92 | Nova 2 Lite |
| Output Capacity | 70 | 80 | Nova 2 Lite |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 60/100 (rank #149), placing it in the top 49% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 60/100 (rank #148), placing it in the top 49% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Choose Nova 2 Lite when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (1000K token context)
- Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
- Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 offers 71% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $12.00/month with Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 vs $42.00/month with Nova 2 Lite - a $30.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.40/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (60/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 and Nova 2 Lite are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
71% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by NVIDIA
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Cost - 71% lower pricing; better value at scale
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
NVIDIA
Nova 2 Lite
Amazon
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 saves you $2.34/month
That's 66% cheaper than Nova 2 Lite at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 1M |
| Max Output Tokens | 16,384 | 65,535 |
| Open Source | Yes | No |
| Created | Oct 10, 2025 | Dec 2, 2025 |