Mistral Large 2407 vs Phi 4
| Signal | Mistral Large 2407 | Delta | Phi 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | +17 | |
Benchmarks | 55 | -18 | |
Pricing | 94 | -6 | |
Context window size | 73 | +13 | |
Recency | 23 | -9 | |
Output Capacity | 20 | -50 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
Score History
66.3
current score
Mistral Large 2407
right now
66.1
current score
Mistral Large 2407
Mistral AI
Phi 4
Microsoft
Phi 4 saves you $486.00/month
That's $5832.00/year compared to Mistral Large 2407 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | Mistral Large 2407 | Phi 4 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 66 | 66 | Mistral Large 2407 |
| Rank | #125 | #127 | Mistral Large 2407 |
| Quality Rank | #125 | #127 | Mistral Large 2407 |
| Adoption Rank | #125 | #127 | Mistral Large 2407 |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 131K | 16K | Mistral Large 2407 |
| Pricing | $2.00/$6.00/M | $0.07/$0.14/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 33 | Mistral Large 2407 |
| Benchmarks | 55 | 73 | Phi 4 |
| Pricing | 94 | 100 | Phi 4 |
| Context window size | 73 | 60 | Mistral Large 2407 |
| Recency | 23 | 33 | Phi 4 |
| Output Capacity | 20 | 70 | Phi 4 |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 66/100 (rank #125), placing it in the top 57% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 66/100 (rank #127), placing it in the top 57% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Choose Mistral Large 2407 when you need:
- Processing long documents or large codebases (131K token context)
- Agentic applications using tool/function calling
Choose Phi 4 when you need:
- High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
- Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Phi 4 offers 97% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $3.15/month with Phi 4 vs $120.00/month with Mistral Large 2407 - a $116.85 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Phi 4 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (131K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.14/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (66/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Mistral Large 2407 and Phi 4 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.20000000000000284 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
By Use Case
Best for Quality
Mistral Large 2407
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Phi 4
97% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
Mistral Large 2407
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
Mistral Large 2407
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
Mistral Large 2407
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by Mistral AI
- Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
- Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
- Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
- Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
| Capability | Mistral Large 2407 | Phi 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoning | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
Mistral Large 2407
Mistral AI
Phi 4
Microsoft
Phi 4 saves you $10.51/month
That's 97% cheaper than Mistral Large 2407 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | Mistral Large 2407 | Phi 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 131K | 16K |
| Max Output Tokens | -- | 16,384 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Nov 19, 2024 | Jan 10, 2025 |