| Signal | GPT-4 Turbo Preview | Delta | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | -33 | |
Benchmarks | 66 | +9 | |
Pricing | 70 | -28 | |
Context window size | 73 | -4 | |
Recency | 0 | -100 | |
Output Capacity | 60 | -30 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 5 wins |
Score History
59.4
current score
GPT-4 Turbo Preview
right now
58.6
current score
OpenAI
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5 saves you $2365.00/month
That's $28380.00/year compared to GPT-4 Turbo Preview at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4 Turbo Preview | Kimi K2.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 59 | 59 | GPT-4 Turbo Preview |
| Rank | #150 | #151 | GPT-4 Turbo Preview |
| Quality Rank | #150 | #151 | GPT-4 Turbo Preview |
| Adoption Rank | #150 | #151 | GPT-4 Turbo Preview |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 128K | 262K | Kimi K2.5 |
| Pricing | $10.00/$30.00/M | $0.40/$1.90/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 83 | Kimi K2.5 |
| Benchmarks | 66 | 57 | GPT-4 Turbo Preview |
| Pricing | 70 | 98 | Kimi K2.5 |
| Context window size | 73 | 77 | Kimi K2.5 |
| Recency | 0 | 100 | Kimi K2.5 |
| Output Capacity | 60 | 90 | Kimi K2.5 |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 59/100 (rank #150), placing it in the top 49% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 59/100 (rank #151), placing it in the top 48% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 1-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Kimi K2.5 offers 94% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $34.50/month with Kimi K2.5 vs $600.00/month with GPT-4 Turbo Preview - a $565.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Kimi K2.5 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($1.90/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (59/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-4 Turbo Preview and Kimi K2.5 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.7999999999999972 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
GPT-4 Turbo Preview
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Kimi K2.5
94% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4 Turbo Preview
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4 Turbo Preview
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4 Turbo Preview
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
| Capability | GPT-4 Turbo Preview | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input)differs | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2.5 saves you $51.00/month
That's 94% cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo Preview at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-4 Turbo Preview | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128K | 262K |
| Max Output Tokens | 4,096 | 262,144 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Jan 25, 2024 | Jan 27, 2026 |