| Signal | GPT-4o | Delta | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -- | |
Benchmarks | 82 | +0 | |
Pricing | 10 | -90 | |
Context window size | 81 | -3 | |
Recency | 7 | -56 | |
Output Capacity | 70 | -13 | |
| Overall Result | 1 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
7
days higher
3
days
20
days higher
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-4o saves you $44250.00/month
That's $531000.00/year compared to o1-pro at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4o | o1-pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 81 | 81 | GPT-4o |
| Rank | #21 | #22 | GPT-4o |
| Quality Rank | #21 | #22 | GPT-4o |
| Adoption Rank | #21 | #22 | GPT-4o |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 128K | 200K | o1-pro |
| Pricing | $2.50/$10.00/M | $150.00/$600.00/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 67 | GPT-4o |
| Benchmarks | 82 | 82 | GPT-4o |
| Pricing | 10 | 100 | o1-pro |
| Context window size | 81 | 84 | o1-pro |
| Recency | 7 | 64 | o1-pro |
| Output Capacity | 70 | 83 | o1-pro |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 81/100 (rank #21), placing it in the top 93% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 81/100 (rank #22), placing it in the top 93% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
GPT-4o offers 98% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $187.50/month with GPT-4o vs $11250.00/month with o1-pro - a $11062.50 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. GPT-4o also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (200K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($10.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (81/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-4o and o1-pro are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.09999999999999432 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
GPT-4o
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-4o
98% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4o
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4o
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4o
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
| Capability | GPT-4o | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Callingdiffers | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
OpenAI
GPT-4o saves you $973.50/month
That's 98% cheaper than o1-pro at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-4o | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128K | 200K |
| Max Output Tokens | 16,384 | 100,000 |
| Open Source | No | No |
| Created | May 13, 2024 | Mar 19, 2025 |
GPT-4o scores 81/100 (rank #21) compared to o1-pro's 81/100 (rank #22), giving it a 0-point advantage. GPT-4o is the stronger overall choice, though o1-pro may excel in specific areas like certain benchmarks.
GPT-4o is ranked #21 and o1-pro is ranked #22 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
GPT-4o is cheaper at $10.00/M output tokens vs o1-pro's $600.00/M output tokens - 60.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: GPT-4o at $2.50/M vs o1-pro at $150.00/M.
o1-pro has a larger context window of 200,000 tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.