Skip to content

o1-pro vs R1

o1-pro

OpenAI

73#78
vs
R1

DeepSeek

74#76
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo1-proDeltaR1
Capabilities
83
+17
67
Benchmarks
77
+3
73
Pricing
5
-92
98
Context window size
76
+1
75
Recency
46
+11
36
Output Capacity
83
+13
70
Overall Result
5 wins
of 6
1 wins
o1-pro wins 5 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (21 data points)
o1-proR1
o1-pro

73.2

current score

Leader

R1

right now

R1

73.7

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o1-pro

OpenAI

Per request$0.450000
Daily$1500.00
Monthly$45000.00
Annual$540000.00

R1

DeepSeek

Best Value
Per request$0.001950
Daily$6.50
Monthly$195.00
Annual$2340.00

R1 saves you $44805.00/month

That's $537660.00/year compared to o1-pro at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose R1 for cost optimization

o1-pro pricing:
Input:$150.00/M tokens
Output:$600.00/M tokens
R1 pricing:
Input:$0.70/M tokens
Output:$2.50/M tokens
o1-pro

OpenAI

73

Composite Score

Winner
R1

DeepSeek

74

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico1-proR1Winner
Overall Score
73
74
R1
Rank#78#76
R1
Quality Rank#78#76
R1
Adoption Rank#78#76
R1
Parameters------
Context Window200K164K
o1-pro
Pricing$150.00/$600.00/M$0.70/$2.50/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
83
67
o1-pro
Benchmarks
77
73
o1-pro
Pricing
5
98
R1
Context window size
76
75
o1-pro
Recency
46
36
o1-pro
Output Capacity
83
70
o1-pro
Benchmark Head-to-Head(13 benchmarks)
o1-pro: 6R1: 4
o1-pro
R1
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
91.8%90.8%
MMLU-Pro
80.3%84%
GPQA Diamond
78%71.5%
MATH-500
96.4%97.3%
HumanEval
92.4%-
SWE-bench Verified
48.9%49.2%
AIME 2024
83.3%79.8%
IFEval
86.5%83.3%
BBH
89%85%
Arena Elo
13501369
LiveBench
-67.3%
HLE
8.12%-
BigCodeBench
32.4%29.7%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o1-proStrong Performer

Scores 73/100 (rank #78), placing it in the top 73% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
R1Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #76), placing it in the top 74% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 1-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o1-pro when you need:

  • Multimodal workflows that require image understanding
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose R1 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Agentic applications using tool/function calling
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
o1-pro
Input cost$150.00/M tokens
Output cost$600.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$10.246
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$11250.00
R1Best Value
Input cost$0.70/M tokens
Output cost$2.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.043
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$48.00

R1 offers 100% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $48.00/month with R1 vs $11250.00/month with o1-pro - a $11202.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o1-proFaster
Speed score0/100
R1
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o1-pro

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. R1 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o1-pro

Long document analysis

Larger context window (200K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

o1-pro

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.50/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

R1

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (74/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

R1

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o1-pro
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
R1

o1-pro and R1 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.5 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
R1
Recommended

by DeepSeek

  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
Capabilityo1-proR1
Vision (Image Input)differs
Function Callingdiffers
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o1-pro

OpenAI

$990.00
estimated monthly cost

R1

DeepSeek

Best Value
$4.26
estimated monthly cost

R1 saves you $985.74/month

That's 100% cheaper than o1-pro at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero1-proR1
Context Window200K164K
Max Output Tokens100,00016,000
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedMar 19, 2025Jan 20, 2025
Last updated: 48m ago

Related comparisons

o1-pro vs R1 (2026) | LM Market Cap