Skip to content

o1 vs Grok 4.7

o1

OpenAI

74#133
vs
Grok 4.7

xAI

89#42
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo1DeltaGrok 4.7
Capabilities
100
--
100
Benchmarks
77
-10
86
Pricing
40
-55
95
Context window size
84
-6
90
Recency
16
-84
100
Output Capacity
80
-10
90
Overall Result
0 wins
of 6
5 wins
Grok 4.7 wins 5 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (32 data points)
o1Grok 4.7
o1

74.4

current score

Leader

Grok 4.7

right now

Grok 4.7

88.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o1

OpenAI

Per request$0.045000
Daily$150.00
Monthly$4500.00
Annual$54000.00

Grok 4.7

xAI

Best Value
Per request$0.004000
Daily$13.33
Monthly$400.00
Annual$4800.00

Grok 4.7 saves you $4100.00/month

That's $49200.00/year compared to o1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

91% cheaper
Choose Grok 4.7 for cost optimization

o1 pricing:
Input:$15.00/M tokens
Output:$60.00/M tokens
Grok 4.7 pricing:
Input:$1.60/M tokens
Output:$4.80/M tokens
o1

OpenAI

74

Composite Score

Winner
Grok 4.7

xAI

89

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico1Grok 4.7Winner
Overall Score
74
89
Grok 4.7
Rank#133#42
Grok 4.7
Quality Rank#133#42
Grok 4.7
Adoption Rank#133#42
Grok 4.7
Parameters------
Context Window200K500K
Grok 4.7
Pricing$15.00/$60.00/M$1.60/$4.80/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
o1
Benchmarks
77
86
Grok 4.7
Pricing
40
95
Grok 4.7
Context window size
84
90
Grok 4.7
Recency
16
100
Grok 4.7
Output Capacity
80
90
Grok 4.7
Benchmark Head-to-Head(13 benchmarks)
o1: 2Grok 4.7: 8
o1
Grok 4.7
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
91.8%91.5%
MMLU-Pro
80.3%83.5%
GPQA Diamond
78%82%
MATH-500
96.4%95%
HumanEval
92.4%95.5%
SWE-bench Verified
48.9%70%
AIME 2024
83.3%88%
IFEval
86.5%91%
BBH
89%90%
Arena Elo
13501462
LiveBench
-73%
HLE
8.12%-
BigCodeBench
32.4%-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o1Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #133), placing it in the top 54% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok 4.7Elite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #42), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Grok 4.7 has a 14-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably better performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o1 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose Grok 4.7 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (500K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
o1
Input cost$15.00/M tokens
Output cost$60.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$1.008
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$1125.00
Grok 4.7Best Value
Input cost$1.60/M tokens
Output cost$4.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.072
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$96.00

Grok 4.7 offers 91% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $96.00/month with Grok 4.7 vs $1125.00/month with o1 - a $1029.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o1Faster
Speed score0/100
Grok 4.7
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o1

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Grok 4.7 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o1

Long document analysis

Larger context window (500K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Grok 4.7

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($4.80/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Grok 4.7

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Grok 4.7

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o1
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 clearly outperforms o1 with a significant 14.399999999999991-point lead. For most general use cases, Grok 4.7 is the stronger choice. However, o1 may still excel in niche scenarios.

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Grok 4.7
Recommended

by xAI

  • Choose for Cost - 91% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
Capabilityo1Grok 4.7
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o1

OpenAI

$99.00
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.7

xAI

Best Value
$8.64
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.7 saves you $90.36/month

That's 91% cheaper than o1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero1Grok 4.7
Context Window200K500K
Max Output Tokens100,000450,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedDec 17, 2024Sep 21, 2026
Last updated: 9m ago

Related comparisons

o1 vs Grok 4.7 (2026) | LM Market Cap