Skip to content

o3 (batch) vs o3 Pro (batch)

o3 (batch)

OpenAI

87#64
vs
o3 Pro (batch)

OpenAI

87#62
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo3 (batch)Deltao3 Pro (batch)
Capabilities
100
--
100
Benchmarks
88
--
88
Pricing
96
+36
60
Context window size
84
--
84
Recency
46
-10
56
Output Capacity
83
--
83
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
1 wins
It's a tie - both models win 1 signals each

Score History Unavailable

Not enough historical data to show a comparison chart. Score history is recorded weekly and will be available after at least two data points are collected.

86.7

o3 (batch)

vs

86.7

o3 Pro (batch)

Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o3 (batch)

OpenAI

Best Value
Per request$0.003000
Daily$10.00
Monthly$300.00
Annual$3600.00

o3 Pro (batch)

OpenAI

Per request$0.030000
Daily$100.00
Monthly$3000.00
Annual$36000.00

o3 (batch) saves you $2700.00/month

That's $32400.00/year compared to o3 Pro (batch) at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

90% cheaper
Choose o3 (batch) for cost optimization

o3 (batch) pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$4.00/M tokens
o3 Pro (batch) pricing:
Input:$10.00/M tokens
Output:$40.00/M tokens
Tie
o3 (batch)

OpenAI

87

Composite Score

Tie
o3 Pro (batch)

OpenAI

87

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico3 (batch)o3 Pro (batch)Winner
Overall Score
87
87
--
Rank#64#62
o3 Pro (batch)
Quality Rank#64#62
o3 Pro (batch)
Adoption Rank#64#62
o3 Pro (batch)
Parameters------
Context Window200K200K--
Pricing$1.00/$4.00/M$10.00/$40.00/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
100
100
o3 (batch)
Benchmarks
88
88
o3 (batch)
Pricing
96
60
o3 (batch)
Context window size
84
84
o3 (batch)
Recency
46
56
o3 Pro (batch)
Output Capacity
83
83
o3 (batch)
Benchmark Head-to-Head(12 benchmarks)
o3 (batch): 012 tieso3 Pro: 0
o3 (batch)
o3 Pro
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
92.3%92.3%
MMLU-Pro
85.8%85.8%
GPQA Diamond
87.7%87.7%
MATH-500
99%99%
HumanEval
97%97%
SWE-bench Verified
71.7%71.7%
AIME 2024
96.7%96.7%
IFEval
92%92%
BBH
93%93%
Arena Elo
14151415
LiveBench
74.8%74.8%
HLE
30.1%30.1%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o3 (batch)Elite Tier

Scores 87/100 (rank #64), placing it in the top 78% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
o3 Pro (batch)Elite Tier

Scores 87/100 (rank #62), placing it in the top 79% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o3 (batch) when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose o3 Pro (batch) when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
o3 (batch)Best Value
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$4.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.058
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$75.00
o3 Pro (batch)
Input cost$10.00/M tokens
Output cost$40.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.577
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$750.00

o3 (batch) offers 90% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $75.00/month with o3 (batch) vs $750.00/month with o3 Pro (batch) - a $675.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o3 (batch)Faster
Speed score0/100
o3 Pro (batch)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o3 (batch)

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. o3 (batch) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o3 (batch)

Long document analysis

Larger context window (200K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

o3 (batch)

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($4.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

o3 (batch)

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (87/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o3 (batch)

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

o3 (batch)
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o3 (batch)

o3 (batch) and o3 Pro (batch) are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

o3 (batch)
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 90% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by OpenAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
Capabilityo3 (batch)o3 Pro (batch)
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o3 (batch)

OpenAI

Best Value
$6.60
estimated monthly cost

o3 Pro (batch)

OpenAI

$66.00
estimated monthly cost

o3 (batch) saves you $59.40/month

That's 90% cheaper than o3 Pro (batch) at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero3 (batch)o3 Pro (batch)
Context Window200K200K
Max Output Tokens100,000100,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedApr 16, 2025Jun 10, 2025
Last updated: 22m ago

Related comparisons

o3 (batch) vs o3 Pro (batch) (2026) | LM Market Cap