Skip to content

Qwen Plus 0728 vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

Qwen Plus 0728

Alibaba

40#318
vs
Qwen3 Coder Plus

Alibaba

40#316
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalQwen Plus 0728DeltaQwen3 Coder Plus
Capabilities
50
--
50
Pricing
99
+2
97
Context window size
95
--
95
Recency
72
-3
75
Output Capacity
75
-5
80
Overall Result
1 wins
of 5
2 wins
Qwen3 Coder Plus wins 2 of 5 signals

Score History

Score History (25 data points)
Qwen Plus 0728Qwen3 Coder Plus
Qwen Plus 0728

40

current score

Leader

Tied

right now

Qwen3 Coder Plus

40

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Qwen Plus 0728

Alibaba

Best Value
Per request$0.000650
Daily$2.17
Monthly$65.00
Annual$780.00

Qwen3 Coder Plus

Alibaba

Per request$0.002275
Daily$7.58
Monthly$227.50
Annual$2730.00

Qwen Plus 0728 saves you $162.50/month

That's $1950.00/year compared to Qwen3 Coder Plus at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

71% cheaper
Choose Qwen Plus 0728 for cost optimization

Qwen Plus 0728 pricing:
Input:$0.26/M tokens
Output:$0.78/M tokens
Qwen3 Coder Plus pricing:
Input:$0.65/M tokens
Output:$3.25/M tokens
Tie
Qwen Plus 0728

Alibaba

40

Composite Score

Tie
Qwen3 Coder Plus

Alibaba

40

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricQwen Plus 0728Qwen3 Coder PlusWinner
Overall Score
40
40
--
Rank#318#316
Qwen3 Coder Plus
Quality Rank#318#316
Qwen3 Coder Plus
Adoption Rank#318#316
Qwen3 Coder Plus
Parameters------
Context Window1000K1000K--
Pricing$0.26/$0.78/M$0.65/$3.25/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
50
Qwen Plus 0728
Pricing
99
97
Qwen Plus 0728
Context window size
95
95
Qwen Plus 0728
Recency
72
75
Qwen3 Coder Plus
Output Capacity
75
80
Qwen3 Coder Plus
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Qwen Plus 0728Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #318), placing it in the top -9% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Qwen3 Coder PlusEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #316), placing it in the top -9% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Qwen Plus 0728 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized

Choose Qwen3 Coder Plus when you need:

  • Budget-friendly applications with moderate quality requirements
Cost-Performance Analysis
Qwen Plus 0728Best Value
Input cost$0.26/M tokens
Output cost$0.78/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.026
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$15.60
Qwen3 Coder Plus
Input cost$0.65/M tokens
Output cost$3.25/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.098
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$58.50

Qwen Plus 0728 offers 73% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $15.60/month with Qwen Plus 0728 vs $58.50/month with Qwen3 Coder Plus - a $42.90 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Qwen Plus 0728Faster
Speed score0/100
Qwen3 Coder Plus
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Qwen Plus 0728

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Qwen Plus 0728 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Qwen Plus 0728

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1000K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Qwen Plus 0728

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.78/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Qwen Plus 0728

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Qwen Plus 0728
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Qwen Plus 0728

Qwen Plus 0728 and Qwen3 Coder Plus are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Qwen Plus 0728
Recommended

by Alibaba

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 73% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Alibaba

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityQwen Plus 0728Qwen3 Coder Plus
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Qwen Plus 0728

Alibaba

Best Value
$1.40
estimated monthly cost

Qwen3 Coder Plus

Alibaba

$5.07
estimated monthly cost

Qwen Plus 0728 saves you $3.67/month

That's 72% cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Plus at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterQwen Plus 0728Qwen3 Coder Plus
Context Window1M1M
Max Output Tokens32,76865,536
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedSep 8, 2025Sep 23, 2025
Last updated: 31m ago

Related comparisons

Qwen Plus 0728 vs Qwen3 Coder Plus (2026) | LM Market Cap