| Signal | GPT-4o-mini | Delta | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 67 | -17 | |
Benchmarks | 77 | +9 | |
Pricing | 99 | +2 | |
Context window size | 81 | -5 | |
Recency | 19 | -81 | |
Output Capacity | 70 | -10 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 6 | 4 wins |
Score History
70.4
current score
Tied
right now
70.4
current score
OpenAI
Alibaba
GPT-4o-mini saves you $85.00/month
That's $1020.00/year compared to Qwen3.5-122B-A10B at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4o-mini | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 70 | 70 | -- |
| Rank | #52 | #50 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| Quality Rank | #52 | #50 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| Adoption Rank | #52 | #50 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| Parameters | -- | 122B | -- |
| Context Window | 128K | 262K | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| Pricing | $0.15/$0.60/M | $0.26/$2.08/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 67 | 83 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| Benchmarks | 77 | 69 | GPT-4o-mini |
| Pricing | 99 | 98 | GPT-4o-mini |
| Context window size | 81 | 86 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| Recency | 19 | 100 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
| Output Capacity | 70 | 80 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.
Scores 70/100 (rank #52), placing it in the top 82% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 70/100 (rank #50), placing it in the top 83% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
GPT-4o-mini offers 68% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $11.25/month with GPT-4o-mini vs $35.10/month with Qwen3.5-122B-A10B - a $23.85 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. GPT-4o-mini also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.60/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (70/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
Image understanding & OCR
Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly
GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
GPT-4o-mini
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
GPT-4o-mini
68% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4o-mini
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4o-mini
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4o-mini
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
| Capability | GPT-4o-mini | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Mode | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Search | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
Alibaba
GPT-4o-mini saves you $1.97/month
That's 67% cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-4o-mini | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128K | 262K |
| Max Output Tokens | 16,384 | 65,536 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Jul 18, 2024 | Feb 25, 2026 |
Both GPT-4o-mini and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B score 70/100, making them extremely close competitors. Choose based on pricing, provider ecosystem, or specific capability requirements.
GPT-4o-mini is ranked #52 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is ranked #50 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
GPT-4o-mini is cheaper at $0.60/M output tokens vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's $2.08/M output tokens - 3.5x more expensive. Input token pricing: GPT-4o-mini at $0.15/M vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B at $0.26/M.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a larger context window of 262,144 tokens compared to GPT-4o-mini's 128,000 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.