Skip to content

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Inkling Small (free)

vs
Inkling Small (free)

thinkingmachines

69#175
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingDeltaInkling Small (free)
Capabilities
83
+17
67
Benchmarks
66
-1
67
Pricing
96
-4
100
Context window size
81
-14
96
Recency
64
-36
100
Output Capacity
72
-14
87
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
5 wins
Inkling Small (free) wins 5 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (34 data points)
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingInkling Small (free)
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

69.2

current score

Leader

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

right now

Inkling Small (free)

68.7

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Alibaba

Per request$0.002400
Daily$8.00
Monthly$240.00
Annual$2880.00

Inkling Small (free)

thinkingmachines

Best Value
Per request$0.000000
Daily$0.00
Monthly$0.00
Annual$0.00

Inkling Small (free) saves you $240.00/month

That's $2880.00/year compared to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose Inkling Small (free) for cost optimization

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking pricing:
Input:$0.40/M tokens
Output:$4.00/M tokens
Inkling Small (free) pricing:
Input:$0.00/M tokens
Output:$0.00/M tokens
Winner
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Alibaba

69

Composite Score

Inkling Small (free)

thinkingmachines

69

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingInkling Small (free)Winner
Overall Score
69
69
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Rank#173#175
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Quality Rank#173#175
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Adoption Rank#173#175
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Parameters235B----
Context Window131K1049K
Inkling Small (free)
Pricing$0.40/$4.00/MFree--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
83
67
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Benchmarks
66
67
Inkling Small (free)
Pricing
96
100
Inkling Small (free)
Context window size
81
96
Inkling Small (free)
Recency
64
100
Inkling Small (free)
Output Capacity
72
87
Inkling Small (free)
Benchmark Head-to-Head(1 benchmarks)
Qwen3 VL: 0Inkling Small: 1
Qwen3 VL
Inkling Small
Normalized 0-100%
Arena Elo
13951441
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingCompetitive

Scores 69/100 (rank #173), placing it in the top 41% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Inkling Small (free)Competitive

Scores 69/100 (rank #175), placing it in the top 40% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 1-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Inkling Small (free) when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Processing long documents or large codebases (1049K token context)
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input cost$0.40/M tokens
Output cost$4.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.064
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$66.00
Inkling Small (free)
Input cost$0.00/M tokens
Output cost$0.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.000
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$0.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingFaster
Speed score0/100
Inkling Small (free)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Inkling Small (free) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Long document analysis

Larger context window (1049K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Inkling Small (free)

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Inkling Small (free)

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (69/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and Inkling Small (free) are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.5 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

by Alibaba

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by thinkingmachines

  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingInkling Small (free)
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Alibaba

$5.52
estimated monthly cost

Inkling Small (free)

thinkingmachines

Best Value
$0.000000
estimated monthly cost

Inkling Small (free) saves you $5.52/month

That's 100% cheaper than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterQwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingInkling Small (free)
Context Window131K1.0M
Max Output Tokens32,768262,144
Open SourceYesYes
CreatedSep 23, 2025Jul 30, 2026
Last updated: 12m ago

Related comparisons

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Inkling Small (free) (2026) | LM Market Cap