Skip to content

Nova Micro 1.0 vs R1

Nova Micro 1.0

Amazon

40#355
vs
R1

DeepSeek

74#134
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalNova Micro 1.0DeltaR1
Capabilities
33
-33
67
Pricing
100
+2
98
Context window size
81
-2
83
Recency
22
-8
30
Output Capacity
62
-8
70
Benchmarks
0
-73
73
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
5 wins
R1 wins 5 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (25 data points)
Nova Micro 1.0R1
Nova Micro 1.0

40

current score

Leader

R1

right now

R1

74.2

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Nova Micro 1.0

Amazon

Best Value
Per request$0.000105
Daily$0.35
Monthly$10.50
Annual$126.00

R1

DeepSeek

Per request$0.001950
Daily$6.50
Monthly$195.00
Annual$2340.00

Nova Micro 1.0 saves you $184.50/month

That's $2214.00/year compared to R1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

95% cheaper
Choose Nova Micro 1.0 for cost optimization

Nova Micro 1.0 pricing:
Input:$0.04/M tokens
Output:$0.14/M tokens
R1 pricing:
Input:$0.70/M tokens
Output:$2.50/M tokens
Nova Micro 1.0

Amazon

40

Composite Score

Winner
R1

DeepSeek

74

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricNova Micro 1.0R1Winner
Overall Score
40
74
R1
Rank#355#134
R1
Quality Rank#355#134
R1
Adoption Rank#355#134
R1
Parameters------
Context Window128K164K
R1
Pricing$0.04/$0.14/M$0.70/$2.50/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
33
67
R1
Pricing
100
98
Nova Micro 1.0
Context window size
81
83
R1
Recency
22
30
R1
Output Capacity
62
70
R1
Benchmarks--
73
R1
Benchmark Head-to-Head(11 benchmarks)
Nova Micro: 0R1: 0
Nova Micro
R1
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-90.8%
MMLU-Pro
-84%
GPQA Diamond
-71.5%
MATH-500
-97.3%
SWE-bench Verified
-49.2%
AIME 2024
-79.8%
IFEval
-83.3%
BBH
-85%
Arena Elo
-1369
LiveBench
-67.3%
BigCodeBench
-29.7%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Nova Micro 1.0Entry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #355), placing it in the top -22% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
R1Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #134), placing it in the top 54% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

R1 has a 34-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Nova Micro 1.0 when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized

Choose R1 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
Nova Micro 1.0Best Value
Input cost$0.04/M tokens
Output cost$0.14/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.004
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$2.63
R1
Input cost$0.70/M tokens
Output cost$2.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.043
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$48.00

Nova Micro 1.0 offers 95% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $2.63/month with Nova Micro 1.0 vs $48.00/month with R1 - a $45.38 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
Nova Micro 1.0Faster
Speed score0/100
R1
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Nova Micro 1.0

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Nova Micro 1.0 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Nova Micro 1.0

Long document analysis

Larger context window (164K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

R1

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.14/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Nova Micro 1.0

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (74/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

R1
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
R1

R1 clearly outperforms Nova Micro 1.0 with a significant 34.2-point lead. For most general use cases, R1 is the stronger choice. However, Nova Micro 1.0 may still excel in niche scenarios.

by Amazon

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 95% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
R1
Recommended

by DeepSeek

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilityNova Micro 1.0R1
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Nova Micro 1.0

Amazon

Best Value
$0.2310
estimated monthly cost

R1

DeepSeek

$4.26
estimated monthly cost

Nova Micro 1.0 saves you $4.03/month

That's 95% cheaper than R1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterNova Micro 1.0R1
Context Window128K164K
Max Output Tokens5,12016,000
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedDec 5, 2024Jan 20, 2025
Last updated: 8m ago

Related comparisons

Nova Micro 1.0 vs R1 (2026) | LM Market Cap