Skip to content

o3 Mini (batch) vs R1

o3 Mini (batch)

OpenAI

74#133
vs
R1

DeepSeek

74#134
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Signalo3 Mini (batch)DeltaR1
Capabilities
83
+17
67
Benchmarks
88
+15
73
Pricing
98
+0
98
Context window size
84
+1
83
Recency
32
+2
30
Output Capacity
83
+13
70
Overall Result
6 wins
of 6
0 wins
o3 Mini (batch) wins 6 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (25 data points)
o3 Mini (batch)R1
o3 Mini (batch)

74.3

current score

Leader

o3 Mini (batch)

right now

R1

74.2

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

o3 Mini (batch)

OpenAI

Best Value
Per request$0.001650
Daily$5.50
Monthly$165.00
Annual$1980.00

R1

DeepSeek

Per request$0.001950
Daily$6.50
Monthly$195.00
Annual$2340.00

o3 Mini (batch) saves you $30.00/month

That's $360.00/year compared to R1 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

15% cheaper
Choose o3 Mini (batch) for cost optimization

o3 Mini (batch) pricing:
Input:$0.55/M tokens
Output:$2.20/M tokens
R1 pricing:
Input:$0.70/M tokens
Output:$2.50/M tokens
Winner
o3 Mini (batch)

OpenAI

74

Composite Score

R1

DeepSeek

74

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
Metrico3 Mini (batch)R1Winner
Overall Score
74
74
o3 Mini (batch)
Rank#133#134
o3 Mini (batch)
Quality Rank#133#134
o3 Mini (batch)
Adoption Rank#133#134
o3 Mini (batch)
Parameters------
Context Window200K164K
o3 Mini (batch)
Pricing$0.55/$2.20/M$0.70/$2.50/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
83
67
o3 Mini (batch)
Benchmarks
88
73
o3 Mini (batch)
Pricing
98
98
o3 Mini (batch)
Context window size
84
83
o3 Mini (batch)
Recency
32
30
o3 Mini (batch)
Output Capacity
83
70
o3 Mini (batch)
Benchmark Head-to-Head(13 benchmarks)
o3 Mini: 10R1: 0
o3 Mini
R1
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
92.3%90.8%
MMLU-Pro
85.8%84%
GPQA Diamond
87.7%71.5%
MATH-500
99%97.3%
HumanEval
97%-
SWE-bench Verified
71.7%49.2%
AIME 2024
96.7%79.8%
IFEval
92%83.3%
BBH
93%85%
Arena Elo
14151369
LiveBench
74.8%67.3%
HLE
30.1%-
BigCodeBench
-29.7%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

o3 Mini (batch)Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #133), placing it in the top 54% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
R1Strong Performer

Scores 74/100 (rank #134), placing it in the top 54% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose o3 Mini (batch) when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving

Choose R1 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
o3 Mini (batch)Best Value
Input cost$0.55/M tokens
Output cost$2.20/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.037
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$41.25
R1
Input cost$0.70/M tokens
Output cost$2.50/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.043
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$48.00

o3 Mini (batch) offers 14% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $41.25/month with o3 Mini (batch) vs $48.00/month with R1 - a $6.75 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
o3 Mini (batch)Faster
Speed score0/100
R1
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

o3 Mini (batch)

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. o3 Mini (batch) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

o3 Mini (batch)

Long document analysis

Larger context window (200K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

o3 Mini (batch)

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($2.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

o3 Mini (batch)

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (74/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

o3 Mini (batch)
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
o3 Mini (batch)

o3 Mini (batch) and R1 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0.09999999999999432 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

o3 Mini (batch)
Recommended

by OpenAI

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 14% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by DeepSeek

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
Capabilityo3 Mini (batch)R1
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Searchdiffers
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

o3 Mini (batch)

OpenAI

Best Value
$3.63
estimated monthly cost

R1

DeepSeek

$4.26
estimated monthly cost

o3 Mini (batch) saves you $0.6300/month

That's 15% cheaper than R1 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
Parametero3 Mini (batch)R1
Context Window200K164K
Max Output Tokens100,00016,000
Open SourceNoYes
CreatedJan 31, 2025Jan 20, 2025
Last updated: 29m ago

Related comparisons

o3 Mini (batch) vs R1 (2026) | LM Market Cap