| Signal | GPT-4o Search Preview | Delta | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
Capabilities | 50 | +17 | |
Pricing | 90 | -10 | |
Context window size | 81 | +5 | |
Recency | 62 | -- | |
Output Capacity | 70 | -10 | |
| Overall Result | 2 wins | of 5 | 2 wins |
Score History
40
current score
Tied
right now
40
current score
OpenAI
rekaai
Reka Flash 3 saves you $730.00/month
That's $8760.00/year compared to GPT-4o Search Preview at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.
| Metric | GPT-4o Search Preview | Reka Flash 3 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 40 | 40 | -- |
| Rank | #257 | #258 | GPT-4o Search Preview |
| Quality Rank | #257 | #258 | GPT-4o Search Preview |
| Adoption Rank | #257 | #258 | GPT-4o Search Preview |
| Parameters | -- | -- | -- |
| Context Window | 128K | 66K | GPT-4o Search Preview |
| Pricing | $2.50/$10.00/M | $0.10/$0.20/M | -- |
| Signal Scores | |||
| Capabilities | 50 | 33 | GPT-4o Search Preview |
| Pricing | 90 | 100 | Reka Flash 3 |
| Context window size | 81 | 76 | GPT-4o Search Preview |
| Recency | 62 | 62 | GPT-4o Search Preview |
| Output Capacity | 70 | 80 | Reka Flash 3 |
Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Here's what the scores mean for these two models:
Scores 40/100 (rank #257), placing it in the top 12% of all 290 models tracked.
Scores 40/100 (rank #258), placing it in the top 11% of all 290 models tracked.
With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.
Reka Flash 3 offers 98% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $4.50/month with Reka Flash 3 vs $187.50/month with GPT-4o Search Preview - a $183.00 monthly difference.
Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.
When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.
Code generation & review
Higher benchmark score (0/100) indicates stronger performance on coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring
Customer support chatbot
Faster response time (speed score 0/100) is critical for user-facing chat. Reka Flash 3 also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support
Long document analysis
Larger context window (128K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass
Batch data extraction
Lower output pricing ($0.20/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily
Creative writing & content
Higher overall composite score (40/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content
GPT-4o Search Preview and Reka Flash 3 are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.
Best for Quality
GPT-4o Search Preview
Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
Best for Cost
Reka Flash 3
98% lower pricing; better value at scale
Best for Reliability
GPT-4o Search Preview
Higher uptime and faster response speeds
Best for Prototyping
GPT-4o Search Preview
Stronger community support and better developer experience
Best for Production
GPT-4o Search Preview
Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
by OpenAI
| Capability | GPT-4o Search Preview | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Function Calling | ||
| Streaming | ||
| JSON Modediffers | ||
| Reasoningdiffers | ||
| Web Searchdiffers | ||
| Image Output |
OpenAI
rekaai
Reka Flash 3 saves you $16.08/month
That's 97% cheaper than GPT-4o Search Preview at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.
Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.
| Parameter | GPT-4o Search Preview | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 128K | 66K |
| Max Output Tokens | 16,384 | 65,536 |
| Open Source | No | Yes |
| Created | Mar 12, 2025 | Mar 12, 2025 |
Both GPT-4o Search Preview and Reka Flash 3 score 40/100, making them extremely close competitors. Choose based on pricing, provider ecosystem, or specific capability requirements.
GPT-4o Search Preview is ranked #257 and Reka Flash 3 is ranked #258 out of 290+ AI models. Rankings use a composite score combining benchmark performance (90%) from MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations, with capabilities and context window as tiebreakers (10%). Scores update hourly.
Reka Flash 3 is cheaper at $0.20/M output tokens vs GPT-4o Search Preview's $10.00/M output tokens - 50.0x more expensive. Input token pricing: GPT-4o Search Preview at $2.50/M vs Reka Flash 3 at $0.10/M.
GPT-4o Search Preview has a larger context window of 128,000 tokens compared to Reka Flash 3's 65,536 tokens. A larger context window means the model can process longer documents and conversations.