Skip to content

Sonar vs Grok 4.7

Sonar

Perplexity

40#392
vs
Grok 4.7

xAI

89#42
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalSonarDeltaGrok 4.7
Capabilities
50
-50
100
Pricing
99
+4
95
Context window size
81
-9
90
Recency
23
-77
100
Output Capacity
81
-9
90
Benchmarks
0
-86
86
Overall Result
1 wins
of 6
5 wins
Grok 4.7 wins 5 of 6 signals

Score History

Score History (32 data points)
SonarGrok 4.7
Sonar

40

current score

Leader

Grok 4.7

right now

Grok 4.7

88.8

current score

LMMarketCap.com
Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Sonar

Perplexity

Best Value
Per request$0.001500
Daily$5.00
Monthly$150.00
Annual$1800.00

Grok 4.7

xAI

Per request$0.004000
Daily$13.33
Monthly$400.00
Annual$4800.00

Sonar saves you $250.00/month

That's $3000.00/year compared to Grok 4.7 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

63% cheaper
Choose Sonar for cost optimization

Sonar pricing:
Input:$1.00/M tokens
Output:$1.00/M tokens
Grok 4.7 pricing:
Input:$1.60/M tokens
Output:$4.80/M tokens
Sonar

Perplexity

40

Composite Score

Winner
Grok 4.7

xAI

89

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricSonarGrok 4.7Winner
Overall Score
40
89
Grok 4.7
Rank#392#42
Grok 4.7
Quality Rank#392#42
Grok 4.7
Adoption Rank#392#42
Grok 4.7
Parameters------
Context Window127K500K
Grok 4.7
Pricing$1.00/$1.00/M$1.60/$4.80/M--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
50
100
Grok 4.7
Pricing
99
95
Sonar
Context window size
81
90
Grok 4.7
Recency
23
100
Grok 4.7
Output Capacity
81
90
Grok 4.7
Benchmarks--
86
Grok 4.7
Benchmark Head-to-Head(11 benchmarks)
Sonar: 0Grok 4.7: 0
Sonar
Grok 4.7
Normalized 0-100%
MMLU
-91.5%
MMLU-Pro
-83.5%
GPQA Diamond
-82%
MATH-500
-95%
HumanEval
-95.5%
SWE-bench Verified
-70%
AIME 2024
-88%
IFEval
-91%
BBH
-90%
Arena Elo
-1462
LiveBench
-73%
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

SonarEntry Level

Scores 40/100 (rank #392), placing it in the top -35% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Grok 4.7Elite Tier

Scores 89/100 (rank #42), placing it in the top 86% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

Grok 4.7 has a 49-point advantage, which typically translates to noticeably stronger performance on complex reasoning, code generation, and multi-step tasks.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Sonar when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized

Choose Grok 4.7 when you need:

  • Processing long documents or large codebases (500K token context)
  • Agentic applications using tool/function calling
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
Cost-Performance Analysis
SonarBest Value
Input cost$1.00/M tokens
Output cost$1.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.050
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$30.00
Grok 4.7
Input cost$1.60/M tokens
Output cost$4.80/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.072
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$96.00

Sonar offers 69% better value per quality point. At 1M tokens/day, you'd spend $30.00/month with Sonar vs $96.00/month with Grok 4.7 - a $66.00 monthly difference.

Latency & Speed
SonarFaster
Speed score0/100
Grok 4.7
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Sonar

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Sonar also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Sonar

Long document analysis

Larger context window (500K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Grok 4.7

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($1.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Sonar

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (89/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Grok 4.7

Image understanding & OCR

Supports vision input - can analyze screenshots, diagrams, photos, and scanned documents directly

Sonar
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 clearly outperforms Sonar with a significant 48.8-point lead. For most general use cases, Grok 4.7 is the stronger choice. However, Sonar may still excel in niche scenarios.

by Perplexity

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Cost - 69% lower pricing; better value at scale
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale
Grok 4.7
Recommended

by xAI

Consider for specialized use cases.

Capability Comparison
CapabilitySonarGrok 4.7
Vision (Image Input)
Function Callingdiffers
Streaming
JSON Modediffers
Reasoningdiffers
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Sonar

Perplexity

Best Value
$3.00
estimated monthly cost

Grok 4.7

xAI

$8.64
estimated monthly cost

Sonar saves you $5.64/month

That's 65% cheaper than Grok 4.7 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterSonarGrok 4.7
Context Window127K500K
Max Output Tokens114,364450,000
Open SourceNoNo
CreatedJan 27, 2025Sep 21, 2026
Last updated: 6m ago

Related comparisons

Sonar vs Grok 4.7 (2026) | LM Market Cap