Skip to content

Hy3 vs Hy3 (free)

Hy3

Tencent

69#106
vs
Hy3 (free)

Tencent

69#105
Signal-by-Signal Comparison
SignalHy3DeltaHy3 (free)
Capabilities
67
--
67
Benchmarks
68
--
68
Pricing
99
-1
100
Context window size
77
--
77
Recency
100
--
100
Output Capacity
20
-70
90
Overall Result
0 wins
of 6
2 wins
Hy3 (free) wins 2 of 6 signals

Score History Unavailable

Not enough historical data to show a comparison chart. Score history is recorded weekly and will be available after at least two data points are collected.

68.8

Hy3

vs

68.8

Hy3 (free)

Interactive Price Comparison
100Kcalls/month
1,000tokens (~1,333 chars)
500tokens (~667 chars)

Hy3

Tencent

Per request$0.000430
Daily$1.43
Monthly$43.00
Annual$516.00

Hy3 (free)

Tencent

Best Value
Per request$0.000000
Daily$0.00
Monthly$0.00
Annual$0.00

Hy3 (free) saves you $43.00/month

That's $516.00/year compared to Hy3 at your current usage level of 100K calls/month.

100% cheaper
Choose Hy3 (free) for cost optimization

Hy3 pricing:
Input:$0.14/M tokens
Output:$0.58/M tokens
Hy3 (free) pricing:
Input:$0.00/M tokens
Output:$0.00/M tokens
Tie
Hy3

Tencent

69

Composite Score

Tie
Hy3 (free)

Tencent

69

Composite Score

Signal-by-Signal Comparison
MetricHy3Hy3 (free)Winner
Overall Score
69
69
--
Rank#106#105
Hy3 (free)
Quality Rank#106#105
Hy3 (free)
Adoption Rank#106#105
Hy3 (free)
Parameters------
Context Window262K262K--
Pricing$0.14/$0.58/MFree--
Signal Scores
Capabilities
67
67
Hy3
Benchmarks
68
68
Hy3
Pricing
99
100
Hy3 (free)
Context window size
77
77
Hy3
Recency
100
100
Hy3
Output Capacity
20
90
Hy3 (free)
Benchmark Head-to-Head(1 benchmarks)
Hy3: 0Hy3 (free): 0
Hy3
Hy3 (free)
Normalized 0-100%
Arena Elo
1413-
Benchmark Interpretation

Our score (0-100) is driven by benchmark performance (90%) from Arena Elo ratings, MMLU, GPQA, HumanEval, SWE-bench, and 15+ standardized evaluations. Capabilities and context window serve as tiebreakers (10%). Learn more about our methodology.

Hy3Competitive

Scores 69/100 (rank #106), placing it in the top 64% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100
Hy3 (free)Competitive

Scores 69/100 (rank #105), placing it in the top 64% of all 290 models tracked.

Raw Quality0/100
Cost Efficiency0/100
Speed0/100

With only a 0-point gap, these models are in the same performance tier. The practical difference in output quality is minimal - your choice should depend on pricing, latency requirements, and specific feature needs.

When to Use Each Model

Choose Hy3 when you need:

  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model

Choose Hy3 (free) when you need:

  • High-volume production workloads where API costs must be minimized
  • Step-by-step reasoning and chain-of-thought problem solving
  • Self-hosted deployments where you need full control over the model
Cost-Performance Analysis
Hy3
Input cost$0.14/M tokens
Output cost$0.58/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.010
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$10.80
Hy3 (free)
Input cost$0.00/M tokens
Output cost$0.00/M tokens
Cost per quality point$0.000
Est. monthly (1M tokens/day)$0.00

Both models are priced similarly, so the decision comes down to quality and features rather than cost.

Latency & Speed
Hy3Faster
Speed score0/100
Hy3 (free)
Speed score0/100

Both models have comparable response speeds. For most applications, the latency difference is negligible.

When latency matters most: Interactive chatbots, IDE code completion, real-time translation, and user-facing applications where response time directly impacts experience. For batch processing, background summarization, or offline analysis, latency is less critical.

Example Use Cases

Code generation & review

Based on overall model capabilities and architecture for coding tasks like generating functions, debugging, and refactoring

Hy3

Customer support chatbot

Suitable for user-facing chat with competitive response times. Hy3 (free) also offers lower per-token costs for high-volume support

Hy3

Long document analysis

Larger context window (262K tokens) can process longer documents, contracts, and research papers in a single pass

Hy3

Batch data extraction

Lower output pricing ($0.00/M) reduces costs when processing thousands of records daily

Hy3 (free)

Creative writing & content

Higher overall composite score (69/100) correlates with better nuance, coherence, and style in long-form content

Hy3
Which Should You Choose?
Our recommendation:
Hy3

Hy3 and Hy3 (free) are extremely close in overall performance (only 0 points apart). Your best choice depends entirely on which specific strengths matter most for your use case.

Hy3
Recommended

by Tencent

  • Choose for Quality - Marginally better benchmark scores; both are excellent
  • Choose for Reliability - Higher uptime and faster response speeds
  • Choose for Prototyping - Stronger community support and better developer experience
  • Choose for Production - Wider enterprise adoption and proven at scale

by Tencent

  • Choose for Cost - 100% lower pricing; better value at scale
Capability Comparison
CapabilityHy3Hy3 (free)
Vision (Image Input)
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
Reasoning
Web Search
Image Output
Monthly Cost Calculator
1,000tokens (600 in / 400 out)
100requests/day (3,000/month)

Hy3

Tencent

$0.9480
estimated monthly cost

Hy3 (free)

Tencent

Best Value
$0.000000
estimated monthly cost

Hy3 (free) saves you $0.9480/month

That's 100% cheaper than Hy3 at 1,000 tokens/request and 100 requests/day.

Assumes 60% input / 40% output token ratio per request. Actual costs may vary based on your usage pattern.

Parameters & Context
ParameterHy3Hy3 (free)
Context Window262K262K
Max Output Tokens--262,144
Open SourceYesYes
CreatedJul 6, 2026Jul 6, 2026
Last updated: 32m ago

Related comparisons

Hy3 vs Hy3 (free) (2026) | LM Market Cap