Skip to content

Cohere vs Amazon

Cohere (5 models) vs Amazon (5 models) - compared across composite scores, pricing, capabilities, and context windows.

Models
5
Avg Score
45
Top Model
Score: 51
Price Range
$0.150 - $10.00
per 1M output tokens
1 free2 open source256K max context
Models
5
Avg Score
44
Top Model
Score: 61
Price Range
$0.140 - $12.50
per 1M output tokens
1.0M max context

Capability Comparison

CapabilityCohereAmazonLeader
Vision
0/54/5Amazon
Reasoning
1/51/5Tie
Function Calling
3/55/5Amazon
JSON Mode
4/50/5Cohere
Web Search
0/50/5Tie
Streaming
5/55/5Tie
Image Output
0/50/5Tie

Pricing Comparison

MetricCohereAmazon
Cheapest Input (per 1M tokens)$0.037
Command R7B (12-2024)
$0.035
Nova Micro 1.0
Cheapest Output (per 1M tokens)$0.150$0.140
Most Expensive Input (per 1M tokens)$2.50
Command A
$2.50
Nova Premier 1.0
Most Expensive Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$12.50
Free Models10
Max Context Window256K1.0M

All Cohere Models (5)

ModelScoreInput $/MOutput $/M
Command A51$2.50$10.00
Command R (08-2024)49$0.150$0.600
Command R+ (08-2024)49$2.50$10.00
North Mini Code (free)40FreeFree
Command R7B (12-2024)36$0.037$0.150

All Amazon Models (5)

ModelScoreInput $/MOutput $/M
Nova 2 Lite61$0.300$2.50
Nova Premier 1.040$2.50$12.50
Nova Lite 1.040$0.060$0.240
Nova Micro 1.040$0.035$0.140
Nova Pro 1.040$0.800$3.20
Frequently Asked Questions

Amazon's focus on multimodal AI reflects their AWS customer base requiring vision for document processing, retail analytics, and manufacturing QA, with Nova 2 Lite (54/100) leading their lineup. Cohere's text-only strategy targets enterprise NLP use cases exclusively, trading multimodal flexibility for specialized text performance and lower complexity, though their top model Command R+ scores only 38/100.

Cohere's partial open source approach allows customers to self-host and customize models for regulated industries, though their average score of 36/100 trails Amazon's 43/100. Amazon's proprietary-only strategy locks customers into AWS infrastructure but delivers 100% function calling coverage (5/5 models) versus Cohere's 50% (2/4), making Amazon superior for production API integrations.

Amazon's superior performance stems from massive compute investment and multimodal training, achieving 80% vision coverage and 100% function calling support across their 5-model portfolio. Cohere's lower scores reflect their bet on efficient inference over raw performance, offering a narrower price range ($0.150-$10.00) compared to Amazon's wider spread ($0.140-$12.50), suggesting different optimization priorities.

Amazon's million-token context enables document-heavy enterprise workflows like contract analysis and codebase understanding, justifying their $12.50/M premium tier pricing. Cohere's 256K limit targets conversational AI and moderate document tasks, focusing on cost efficiency with their cheapest model at $0.150/M versus Amazon's $0.140/M, a negligible 7% difference that doesn't justify the 4x context limitation.

Both providers show weak reasoning coverage, with Amazon's 20% (1/5) barely beating Cohere's 0%, indicating neither prioritizes complex analytical tasks despite Amazon's higher average score of 43/100. This gap pushes both toward simpler applications: Cohere for text generation and classification, Amazon for vision-enabled workflows leveraging their 80% vision model coverage.

Cohere vs Amazon - AI Provider Comparison (2026) | LM Market Cap